I really like the idea of a randomly picked group of folks reviewing the performance or even choosing the chief executive and/or board of a group or even government body or executive! This would probably, as per your suggestion, involve more than one citizen assembly, so that one could pore over applicants, and another could pick the winners, with maybe yet another one deciding how this would all work. I wonder if there are data on whether it would be more effective to choose random candidates or ones based on merit?
Eager to read the upcoming chapter! 😊
I really like the idea of a randomly picked group of folks reviewing the performance or even choosing the chief executive and/or board of a group or even government body or executive! This would probably, as per your suggestion, involve more than one citizen assembly, so that one could pore over applicants, and another could pick the winners, with maybe yet another one deciding how this would all work. I wonder if there are data on whether it would be more effective to choose random candidates or ones based on merit?